• Skip to main content

VSTE

Virginia Society for Technology in Education

  • About
    • About VSTE
    • Committees
      • Advocacy
      • Awards
      • Education
      • Elections
      • Equity & Diversity
      • Finance
      • Outreach
    • Get Involved
    • Leadership
    • VSTE Corporate Council
  • Blog
  • Events
    • VSTE Calendar
    • Annual Conference
    • Annual Conference Archives
    • The Leading Ed Forum 2025
    • Power of Coaching 2025
    • Corporate and Conference Sponsorship Opportunities
  • Prof. Services
  • VCC
  • #VSTE25
  • Membership
    • Subscribe/Join
  • Contact
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Search

Search Results for: power of coaching

VSTE Certified Coach Applications Open!

December 9, 2022 by Brian Thomas

We’ve got news for ALL of our ITCs and ITRTs!

This coming January (2023) we are launching the VSTE Certified Coach Program (VCC), designed specifically to provide high-caliber professional learning and networking events for Virginia's ITCs and ITRTs.

 

Unlike the average online training course or coaching book, the VCC is designed to directly impact teaching and learning. Over the span of 5 months, coaches will meet regularly with a small cohort of like-minded coaches to learn the latest research-based coaching strategies and methods and collaborate on real-life coaching challenges.

Participating in the VCC and earning a VSTE Certified Coach credential will empower you to become an active change agent in your school division and elevate your ability to impact instruction and learning.

Spots are limited for both the Spring '23 and Fall '23 cohorts. The registration deadline is December 16th, 2022. All applicants will be notified of their acceptance status on January 5th, 2023. Submit your application today and join an incredible adventure of growth and connection!

VSTE Certified Coach Application (http://bit.ly/VCCapp23)

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet

Filed Under: Blog, VSTE News

Teachers as Learners: Making Professional Learning Meaningful through Modeling, Engagement, and Fun!

April 4, 2022 by timstahmer

The past two years have been a time of profound change in the field of education. The challenges of meeting the needs of teaching and learning during a pandemic have been significant, and teachers have had to adapt their instruction in order to teach in a variety of modalities that have been continuously shifting since the spring of 2020. In some districts, teaching transitioned from virtual asynchronous to virtual synchronous to hybrid, blended, and concurrent all within a single school year.

These shifts have required a significant amount of learning on the part of teachers. Initially, the learning was primarily training focused on new tools and platforms, such as Zoom, Canvas, Schoology, etc. Over a short period of time teachers had to master a large number of new technical and operational skills, ranging from sharing digital content in a virtual meeting to creating instructional videos using screen casting and webcams. The learning curve was steep, and coaches, leaders, and support staff worked diligently to provide training and support for teachers.

Interestingly, as this initial learning curve leveled, there was an opportunity to shift away from training toward intentional professional development. As an Instructional Technology Coach, I had an opportunity to shift my own practice and to change how I provided professional learning to my teachers in order to be responsive to their needs, to support them in adopting new blended strategies, and to model instructional practices that they had probably never experienced themselves as learners. I recognized a widespread sense of overwhelm and burnout in my teachers, and I was determined to find ways to support them while also improving teaching and learning.

In this post, I hope to share what I have learned and how I have found success with providing professional learning that allows my teachers to experience strategies from the learner’s perspective, understand why best practices for engagement and learner-centered strategies really work, and have some fun along the way.

From Fire Hose to Sprinkler

photo of a firehose blasting water photo of sprinkler spraying water on a lawn

Out of necessity, myself and my fellow Instructional Technology Coaches spent the summer and fall of 2020 creating and providing a lot of training for teachers on Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Canvas. I was generating How-To documents, creating Canvas training modules, offering live workshops, sending out How-To videos almost daily, and providing support almost around the clock. It was necessary, but it was overwhelming and the focus was on getting up and running and “how” to use the tools. During this time the teachers felt like they were trying to drink from a firehose, and I felt like I was the firehose.

Eventually, teachers became more comfortable with the basics and could use the tools to function, and I found myself needing to provide less training. I wanted to start working on moving teachers from how to use the tools to why to use them, and how to use them well. I wanted to shift from an operational focus to an emphasis on pedagogy and how to teach effectively in these new learning environments. However, teachers were still in a space of overwhelm and I needed to find a new approach. I needed to put down the firehose.

I decided to be a sprinkler instead of a firehose. I wanted to move away from mandatory training to optional professional learning that would appeal to teachers and support them in the challenges they were facing. The firehose is a high-volume stream of water that puts out a fire by saturating it and stepping in front of it can be painful. A sprinkler, on the other hand, is a fun way to cool off and you can choose to run quickly through or jump in and get soaked. I wanted to offer a sprinkler that teachers could come and play in to dip their toe in for a little information, or to run through at their own pace for a lot of information. I asked teachers want they wanted in their professional learning sessions and what would make them worth attending. The feedback I received is shown in the word cloud below.

graphic of a word cloud
Figure 1: What Teachers Want in Professional Learning

I started with a professional learning model I coined Try-ITs, which stands for Try Instructional Technology. I designed these Try-IT workshops to provide teachers with an opportunity to try new tools and strategies as learners first before attempting to utilize them as teachers. I had a lot of success with this model and have since presented on the framework at conferences around the country. This year I have built upon this framework and continue to adapt to meet the needs of my teachers. I have discovered three strategies for designing professional development that have been very successful that I want to share, which are allowing teachers to be learners, modeling high impact teaching and engagement strategies, and incorporating fun.

Teachers as Learners

venn diagram of teachers as learners

It has long been accepted that adults and children learn differently. In fact, the fields of pedagogy and andragogy are filled with research on the differences between these two types of learners. Malcolm Knowles was an American educator known for using the term andragogy to describe adult learning. Knowles developed five assumptions of adult learners and four principles of andragogy, shown in the graphic below, in the 1980s that established ways in which adults learned differently from children.

However, there is an alternative view emerging in which the fields of andragogy and pedagogy can be viewed as having overlap or commonalities. A new term, metagogy, is gaining traction as the “framework for selecting contextually appropriate teaching practices. It offers up a both-and process for developing and implementing methods, strategies, and techniques for educating adults.” (Stroghschen, 2020) This both-and approach allows for the realization that teachers can benefit from some of the same learning strategies as their students. Nina Smith, Mentor for Teacher Education at Western Governors University, states that “when teaching is seen primarily as an attempt to empower students to learn autonomously by providing support, feedback and resources for that learning, there is not a big difference in teaching adults or kids… Deep learning happens in the same way in children and adults: student finds learning material interesting and becomes engaged beyond the minimum requirement to complete the task” (Smith, 2013).

diagram showing the principles of andragogy
Figure 2: Principles of Andragogy, adapted from eLearning Industry Infographic (Hocutt, 2018)

Take a closer look at the four principles of Andragogy above. The connections between each of these adult learning and student-centered instruction are clear. The first principle states that adults need to be involved in the planning and evaluation of their instruction. This connects to student voice and choice, students constructing their own knowledge, and students self-assessing. The second principle refers to experience and learning from mistakes as critical to adult learning. This ties directly to differentiating learning based on our students and their life experiences and providing timely and personalized feedback to help them learn from their mistakes.

The third principle discusses relevance of content, interest in subjects, and impact on learners’ lives. This is clearly important for our K-12 students as well, and we are always working to provide authentic, personalized, and relevant learning experiences. Finally, the fourth principle indicates that learning should be problem-centered rather than content-oriented. Education has emphasized in recent years that project-based learning, performance tasks, and thinking and problem-solving skills are essential for improving learning for K-12 students.

Capitalizing on these deeper learning strategies in both adult and student learning is what moves learning from performative to transformative in any setting. Nina Smith concludes that “even though there are apparent differences between children and adults as students, the same basic principles of meaningfulness and personalized learning must be present for both groups to prevent potentially transformative learning from turning to an externalized performance.” (Smith, 2013)

Having taught both children and adults over the course of my profession, I agree wholeheartedly that there is an overlap between the best approaches for teaching both groups. I have been able to apply this mindset by designing professional learning that provides teachers with the opportunity to engage in learning in much the same way we want to provide learning for our students. Some examples are providing teachers with voice and choice in what, how, and when they learn, making professional learning engaging and active, and modeling the same high impact instructional strategies that we want teachers to use in their own instruction. I approach designing professional learning in the same way that I would approach designing instruction for students. I want to move away from “sit and get” delivery and training, to meaningful learning experiences in which teachers can expand their understanding of how learning feels in student-centered versus traditional instructional models.

As the field of education is ever-changing, especially in the area of education technology, it is essential that teachers embrace the role of lifelong learners. To that end, professional learning should be relevant, engaging, and fun – not overwhelming and unpleasant.

Modeling Strategies

Blackboard with Chinese proverb

According to an Edutopia post titled “How to Create Meaningful PD”, modeling instructional practices and providing a variety of tools are essential for effective professional development sessions (Plotinsky, 2020). I have found this to be especially true in recent years, as instructional practices are shifting from teacher-centered to learner-centered and as educational technology is increasing in availability and usability. Many teachers came through the educational system as learners in more traditional environments and with limited technology. Even the most veteran and skilled teachers are always looking for ways to grow and improve their practice, and sometimes they need help understanding what strategies that are new to them look like. How can we expect teachers to teach in ways that they have never experienced as learners? The answer is by modeling these instructional practices and tools with teachers as learners.

As the Chinese proverb goes: Tell me I forget, show me I remember, involve me I understand. I can tell teachers how effective a strategy is, but to show them by letting them experience the strategy as a learner is when I usually see the “A-ha” moments. Once that light bulb goes on in their minds, I can involve teachers organically because they connect with the new strategy and often begin brainstorming and collaborating on how they are going to start using it. I love it when this happens during the professional learning session and I can move from modeling to facilitating, and it is exciting to see where they take the learning.

This year I have been focusing on pairing instructional strategies with high effect sizes, based on John Hattie’s research on visible learning, with some of the education technology tools and platforms we already have in place in our division. My goal is to increase the use of these research-based strategies while also increasing the effective use of the technology. As an example, consider the jigsaw method as an instructional strategy and Nearpod as an edtech tool. If I were leading a professional learning on these two topics, I would model how to use Nearpod’s interactive features to conduct a jigsaw learning activity. I would break teachers into groups or use breakout rooms, provide a variety of resources on different aspects of the jigsaw method, have each teacher in a group interact with a different jigsaw resource, and then report back to their group on their learning.

I would then showcase additional Nearpod tools by having the groups share back with the larger session. In doing this, I used the jigsaw method to teach the jigsaw method. I also modeled how to use Nearpod to effectively organize the activity and engage learners. I would also provide templates, examples, and additional resources so that teachers would leave with tools to use right away in trying out the strategies in their own classrooms.

That is just one example, but the concept can be applied to any topic you want teachers to learn about. As an Instructional Technology Coach, I always try to connect any technology tool or platform to best practices in instruction and demonstrate how to teach effectively with the tools. The graphic below provides some additional examples of instructional strategies that can be modeled directly in professional learning by allowing teachers to take on the role of learners. Can you imagine all the educational technology platforms that could be used to model each of these strategies?

graphic showing modeling strategy
Figure 3: Instructional Strategies that Can be Modeled in Professional Learning

Finally, I have learned that through all of the challenges of embracing lifelong learning and adapting to teaching during a pandemic, teachers crave connection and fun. Running through a sprinkler is a fun way to cool off on a hot summer day, and professional learning when designed effectively can be a pleasant way to connect with colleagues and enjoy learning new strategies and improving practice. When I first introduced the Try-IT workshops, I intentionally incorporated fun and games into every session. There were some weeks when it felt like attending these sessions and “TRYing” out new things together was the only time I saw teachers smile or laugh. In a time when we were teaching remotely through screens and quarantining in our own classrooms or even homes, professional learning activities were a time for connection and collaboration.

Another takeaway I have learned from trying to make professional learning fun and encouraging teachers to attend is that most teachers love to be rewarded and many of them love healthy competition. I now know that giving a teacher a sticker to show off on a sticker chart can be a strong motivator. I have learned that the science teachers want to win over the math teachers, and that they will attend, participate, and do almost anything to earn points and try to win a school-wide competition.

This is an element of fun that I had not ever considered before the pandemic. It’s not as though the ideas weren’t out there, but I had been focused more on what I wanted to teach my teachers than how to make their learning fun. What a game changer! Now, I don’t offer any professional learning without awarding some sort of prize or badge. I often hold raffle drawings or BINGO contests for attendance, and I always look for ways to foster healthy, fun competition between teachers or groups. Not only has this made my professional learning sessions more fun for my teachers, but it has made them more fun for me. The best part is that even these fun ideas are modeling strategies that teachers can use to make learning more fun for their own students.

Some ways that I have made professional learning fun over the past two years are sticker charts, department competitions, march madness competitions, digital badging, door prizes, raffle drawings, BINGO cards for session attendance, shoutouts at faculty meetings and lots and lots of engaging games and fun during the sessions themselves. In addition, I have been encouraging my teachers to start sharing their learning by leading mini PD sessions themselves. I have held Monday Make & Takes, Tuesday Sip & Shares, and Try-IT-athons, just to name a few. I have started collecting ideas for making PD fun that I hope to incorporate going forward and have shared some of these in Figure 4. The learning is always centered around what teachers need most and how to model strategies while they take on the role of student, but having fun is a great way to keep them attending and just add some joy to all of our professional lives.

graphic with fun PD ideas
Figure 4: Ideas for Making PD Fun

The past two years have brought incredible challenges to teaching and learning, and educators have had to do a lot of learning and adapting to meet the needs of students in a dynamically changing instructional landscape. As an Instructional Technology Coach, I have had to adapt my practices to meet the needs of teachers as they shift their instruction to rise up and meet these challenges. It has been one of the hardest and also most rewarding times of my professional career. Just as teachers have had to redesign instruction to continue incorporating student-centered in new blended learning environments, I have worked to redesign professional learning to best support teachers as learners.

I have had success in focusing on the three strategies outlined in this post: allowing teachers to take on the role of learners, modeling research-based best practices for engagement and instruction, and finding ways to infuse fun, rewards and connection into every session. I hope that these strategies might inspire other coaches and leaders to find innovative ways to support teachers in growing their practices and pursuing lifelong learning. I have enjoyed sharing these ideas at conferences and connecting with other educators along the way, and I hope you we can continue sharing ideas to support teaching and learning as a community. Let’s connect and make teaching and learning fun!


Written by Emily Heller. Emily is an Instructional Technology Coach in Fredericksburg, Virginia. She is a Director on the VSTE Board and a member of the VSTE Coaching Crew. Emily has presented on her professional learning frameworks at VSTE, VASCD, TCEA, and FETC conferences. Connect with her on Twitter @emilyhellertech.

References

Hocutt, D. (2018, April 19). Adult Learning Theory: Malcom Knowles & Andragogy. Retrieved from SPCS Pedagogy Community: https://blog.richmond.edu/pedagogy/adult-learning-theory-malcolm-knowles-andragogy/

Smith, N. (2013, January 1). Andragogy and Pedagogy: Similarities in Teaching Adults and K-12 Students. Retrieved March 2022, from The Evolllution: A Modern Campus Illumination: https://evolllution.com/opinions/andragogy-and-pedagogy-similarities-in-teaching-adults-and-k-12-students/

Stroghschen, G. (2020). By Means of Critical Theory: Informed Emancipatory Eduation - An Essay on REalities and Possiblities. In V. Wang, Handboook of Research on Ethical Challenges in Higher Education Leadership and Administration (pp. 296-308). IGI Global. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4141-8.ch016

Technology Resources

The word cloud shown in Figure 1 was generated using Mentimeter. Figure 2 which was adapted from an eLearning Industry infographic as cited. All other graphics were designed utilizing Canva for Educators.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet

Filed Under: Blog, Front Page Middle, VSTE Voices Tagged With: professional development, teachers

What School Cafeterias Can Teach Us About Student Performance Analytics

November 9, 2021 by timstahmer

Cafeterias, from a time and cost efficiency perspective, are superior to made-to-order food services. We can apply that same “Grab-and-Go” concept to student data – providing real-time analytics and insights that truly support every child, every day.

Cartoon showing hands on various digital devices

The origins of cafeterias as a food service concept can be traced to the 1880s. The New York Exchange Buffet is thought to be the first restaurant to adopt this innovation. The National School Lunch Act of 1946 set the stage for the creation of school cafeterias.

Schools in the 1950s began the widespread creation of school lunchrooms and cafeterias as a food service method. Cafeterias were one of the first self-service business concepts. They have the advantage of allowing a few to serve many with extreme efficiency. School cafeterias prepare and serve hundreds of meals in a short period of time with a relatively small staff. Students select their meal choices, transport their food to tables, and then deliver their plates and cutlery to the dishwashers. Cafeterias, from a time and cost efficiency perspective, are superior to made-to-order food services.

Fast-forward to Self-Serve Data

In 2021, access to student performance data is still mainly on a “made-to-order” basis. Service providers are often the spread-thin school IT workers. With the explosion of computers in the classroom and digital curriculum, the IT team finds themselves no longer in the background but instead on the frontline in the delivery of essential teaching services. With the move to online classes following the COVID-19 pandemic, even greater demands are being made on IT.

Customer self-service is one of the hallmark achievements of the web and yet most organizations are yet to apply this concept to data.

Most data is trapped in silos (apps) and inaccessible to all but those who have the permissions, skills, and software to access raw data and make sense of it. In many cases, that means IT needs to be called in to complete the reporting picture. Most reports utilize data found in multiple apps. In order to use data together from multiple sources, it must be collected in a central location and structured in a common format creating interoperability and comparability. Think about the simple case of comparing student scores from a State administered math assessment to their grades from math class. The State data comes in a nicely formatted file with student names and ID numbers. The grade data comes from the local SIS with student names and ID numbers. All you need to do is match the ID numbers somehow. Sounds good, right? Except when you realize State data and the local data use different ID numbering systems. Now what?

Neither teachers nor IT staff have much extra time. Most educators recognize the importance of making data-driven decisions for the benefit of their students. Performance data for students resides in many disparate applications. A manual “made-to-order” approach to data distribution means that for every request, someone must collect data from disparate sources and then organize it into a report. This type of data delivery has a significant disadvantage in that it introduces many manual steps and thus creates many opportunities for human error. In addition, after the time-lag between sourcing the data, combining it, getting it right and final delivery to the consumer, the information is almost certainly out of date. Fulfilling report requests this way is a slow and cumbersome process and competes for resources from other vital services, forcing greater attention to demand management policies.

What manifests is an odd situation such that there is an inverse correlation between the human effort to produce a report and it's ultimate value.

graph showing a downward curve

The result is what we see in most schools today: the difficulty and level of effort in gaining access to good data deters the ongoing use of data and therefore data-driven instruction. Now more than ever, cost-efficient methods are needed to serve data at scale. Self-service and system automation will recover valuable IT human resources already spread thin and turn the idea of using data to advance learning into a reality.

A Vision for the “Data Cafeteria”

The rapid creation and introduction of instructional tech during the pandemic has created an explosion of data, but the key is putting it to use to address the learning loss and equity gaps we read about in the news every day.

Student data should be integrated – automatically and continuously collected, organized, and loaded into data views that support analysis of educational objectives at all levels.

Access should be provided through a simple and easy-to-use interface. The “data cafeteria” should always be open to its customers stocked with real-time data. No longer should educators need to request reports and spreadsheets be prepared for them. Instead, they should be able to digitally “Grab-and-Go.”

Building a Real-Time Data Service

The first steps in building a real-time data service are similar to how nutritionists design the menus for school cafeterias – school leaders should identify the benchmarks that they want their teams to work towards and clearly identify student performance goals. It’s worth noting these goals could span a broad range of data categories: academic, behavioral, attendance, engagement, social, emotional, etc.

Identify your goals

The objective here is to identify metrics that can be used to track progress toward addressing specific problems or strategic goals important to your schools. Think about goals outlined in your school or district level annual or 90-day plans or both. For example, let’s say you want to address a concern about chronic absenteeism for English language learners at one school and reading proficiency among minority students at another school. Defining “success” in these cases may be straightforward or a nuanced and collaborative effort. This definition process is key as you will see in what happens next.

With specific objectives and a data-informed definition of success, you have the fuel to drive the next part – implementing and using a data service. There are two critical activities involved in this effort: system implementation and building a data culture.

Implement your data service

System implementation involves identifying an internal team to validate and likely an external partner to implement. The internal team will include your IT, accountability, and school leaders who will ensure the right solution is identified and implemented. Your external partner will have experience with deploying student performance analytics in schools. They will work with your internal team to ensure anything deployed not only meets the immediate objectives previously defined but is also flexible enough to address those questions you haven’t asked – in a manner intuitive to your end-users.

In the past, this kind of effort was daunting and only undertaken by large districts with serious IT budgets. The good news is there are powerful solutions in place today which are within reach of even the smallest school districts from a time, cost, and effort standpoint.

Build your data culture

Building a data culture is all about organizational change management. Think about the days before the cafeteria or its ubiquitous cousin, fast food. If you knew nothing but table service, the idea of self-service was an unknown you would probably avoid. When you collaborated with your teams to define “success” around certain metrics, you started the process of building the data culture and removing the fear of the unknown. You were generating a shared commitment to the idea that data will define success. Your system implementation partner should understand this. Beyond just rolling out software, they should be ready to provide the leadership coaching essential to helping you build a data culture. Check out this link to get a better understanding of data culture.

Reaping the Benefits

The initial build-out of a data system will take some time to accomplish, but it should not take too much time. The benefits are both immediate access to the information that educators need to make real-time instructional decisions combined with the elimination of thousands of requests to IT for that very same information. Once data is collected and organized in a central repository, countless insights can be provided continuously and automatically on a self-serve basis. A few views that can be particularly useful are multi-year individual student data portfolios; peer comparisons; and subgroup comparisons.

As schools advance from primarily using data to meet compliance requirements, the promise of providing navigational insights to align school action in support of the education of every child every day will finally be realized.


Logo for ReadWrite Digital

Provided by ReadWrite Digital, a Virginia-based Student Performance Management Solutions company with a dedicated mission: We Make K-12 Education Data Easy. Our team of professionals has decades of experience on the front lines of Education and Technology. Visit our blog to read more insightful K-12 Education Data and Leadership news.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet

Filed Under: Blog, Front Page Middle, VSTE Partners Tagged With: cafeteria, Data, service

Board Candidate – Patrick Hausammann

April 6, 2019 by timstahmer

Patrick Hausammann, candidate for VSTE Board 2019Patrick Hausammann
Instructional Technology Resource Teacher
Clarke County Public Schools

Educational Leadership

I have been a leader for instructional technology in Clarke County for seven years including professional development and edtech coaching as well as leading the district innovation committee. This committee strives to shape the future of Clarke County Public Schools by encouraging innovative educator and student learning through utilizing technology, promoting best practices, and maintaining a growth mindset. In 2018, we held our first Innovation Conference with 45 concurrent sessions and 2 keynotes, taking a monumental step towards giving teachers voice and choice in personalizing their learning. All learner should be able to determine their own trajectory and path towards personal greatness.

Vision for VSTE

VSTE should and will continue to be a pillar of support and advocate not only for meaningful technology integration but for what is right and equitable for all members of our learning community. VSTE should work to augment it’s free professional development opportunities through avenues such as virtual conferences, webinars, and more. It must be a tenet of VSTE to work to close equity gaps within the digital realm and beyond throughout the commonwealth. Every school, every learner, every educator, should know of and be buoyed by VSTE and the professional learning network it embodies.

Biographical Sketch

Patrick Hausammann a perpetual optimist and believer in the power of a #growthmindset to #failforward en route to creativity and innovation. He’s the founder of a future non-profit, UnisonEDU.org, a co-founder of #EdcampNSV and is also a G Suite for Education Certified Innovator and Trainer. He takes great pride and satisfaction in helping others achieve at their highest levels through pairing great pedagogy with innovative technology to yield #EndlessPromise for learners. His desire to help others and learn forever is best encapsulated by the following quote from Mahatma Gandhi, “Live as if you’ll die tomorrow. learn as if you’ll live forever.”

Back to Candidate Page

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet

Filed Under: Board of Directors, Elections, VSTE News Tagged With: 2019 elections, board, candidate, governance

2015 VSTE Award Winners

October 31, 2015 by vsteadmin

Each year, VSTE recognizes exemplary educators through several different awards.  We are proud to announce this year’s recipients who will be recognized at the Annual Educational Technology Conference.

Doug Saunders Doug Saunders is the 2015 Outstanding Teacher of the Year. Doug is an experienced teacher and instructional coach who inspires others to become confident in implementing 21st century instruction within their daily curriculum. He currently works as an ITRT at Holman Middle School in Henrico County. Doug’s educational philosophy that by using technology, educators can provide an interactive, meaningful, experience and create an environment where students can learn at their own pace, actively seeking out new information and empowering themselves to master content and embrace lifelong learning, is evident in his approach and coaching of teachers. The Huskie Exchange, now in its third year, was created to provide opportunities for teachers learn from one another and to share high-quality engaging lessons that incorporate 21st century skills. Doug’s approach to professional development for himself and his teachers, is a model for other ITRTs in Henrico County. He is constantly looking for new and creative ideas but more importantly his ability to affect change within a school and a division through coaching and professional development is what makes him an amazing teacher and an invaluable member of our HCPS ITRT team.

Dr. Helen CromptonDr. Helen Crompton is the 2015 Outstanding Leader of the Year. Dr. Crompton is an assistant professor of Instructional Technology in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Old Dominion University. She has dedicated her life to improving educational technology at all levels: local, state, regional, national, and global. Locally, Dr. Crompton has brought K-12 and university educators together. In collaboration, both practitioners and scholars have worked to ensure that our future teachers go out into the Commonwealth, and beyond, prepared with the technological knowledge, skills, and tools they need to educate 21st century children. Globally, Dr. Crompton is working with two divisions of the United Nations to educate the public regarding the benefits of educational technology. Dr. Helen Crompton works tirelessly to enhance the lives of learners at all levels. She is an outstanding advocate for educational technologies and is an outstanding candidate for this award.

Kim HarrisonKim Harrison is the 2015 Innovative Educator of the Year. Kim is an Instructional Technology Specialist based at Indian Lakes Elementary School in Virginia Beach. Kim is truly an innovator. She has a passion for sharing virtual environments and was the innovator behind Virginia Beach City Public Schools bringing Minecraft into the elementary classroom. Kim has shared her passion for bringing Minecraft into the elementary classroom in her school, throughout the division (through division-wide professional development courses), and across the state of Virginia (as she serves as Chair for VSTE's new Virtual Environments Professional Learning Network and leads sessions at the VSTE conference each year). Another pet project is VSTE Island in Second Life. She can always be found "in world" leading a book study, modeling to a newbie how to walk around (as opposed to appearing as a floating head), or just hanging out. Kim is always ready to jump in and answer any questions from those of us who "just don't get it!" Kim’s passion for this technology and dedication to bringing this awesome new technology to her young students impresses all who know her.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Tweet

Filed Under: Awards, VSTE News Tagged With: Award Winners

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • About
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Prof. Services
  • VCC
  • #VSTE25
  • Membership
  • Contact
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Search

Support

Copyright © 2025 Virginia Society for Technology in Education · Log in